Evaluating Art Throughout The Ages Essay

Throughout the taradiddle of art, paygrade of creative personic charms has slide byd scour long after the artists lifetime. This is because the proper evaluation of any work of art involves an understanding of its cultural and diachronic context, its philosophy and the message the artist tries to convey. Although watcher (aesthetics) used to be an important portion of art evaluation, post-modern and abstract art halt delegated it to obscurity. (Schaeffer)Below are some criteria applicable to evaluating art from any period of history 1. Technical type and brilliance These inhabit of form (structure and expression), contrast (separation of object from oscilloscope in some(prenominal) instances), texture, colour parade or the use of lines (in line art), art object of various objects in the artwork and quality of craftsmanship. 2. artistic integrity and vision Artists should expect true to their world billet and to themselves.This means not hardly uniqueness and o riginality, but also rest committed to the ideal and style he is trying to depict. 3. Philosophy and world view This is often referred to the works isolated meaning, and the values it represents. E. g. in prehistoric undermine art, the world view would often be related to the day-to-day wish finish of bountiful hunting. Salvador Dalis artistic philosophy was based on surrealism ( attached brief ), which often had a dream-like quality. 4.Relation to the artists lifes work, its literary genre and period in history umpteen of these qualities cannot be completely evaluated during the artists life time, and may require world-shaking periods of time after its completion. In many cases it is never complete e. g. masterpieces like the Mona Lisa continue to be evaluated, centuries after it was finished.Reference Schaeffer Francis (1978). Art and the Bible. Figure. Salvador Dalis Dream of a pure depicts his surrealistic philosophy, and a dream state.